Drafts Rafael and Jacqueline.
Comments on the draft Luis Rafael and Jacqueline.
Luis Rafael, I tell you that this week was fatal to me. Much work, especially at the University of Monterrey.
read, very carefully the first version of PC CL and fascinated me. Has a decent summary of the course of Diego. You have a very clear assessment rubric and the categories of participation, moderation and evaluation.
both know that we are a pioneer of this way of thinking about online courses (our Master Diego), also agreed to make a replica of the course (the experiment), each in their workspace. You with the teachers and I UNELLEZ with children (16 years) grade 11 ° at my institution.
In a second comment, I dedicate to "give you lead" hahaha ... like you said it lovingly in our meeting by Skype on Monday, with the rubric in hand.
Lead today is directed to the following, reads: "assessment of learning outcomes. " Let me know if for you it hides behind this form of learning (courses open), some educational theory as behaviorism, constructivism, information processing, learning and complex cognitive processes etc. or is irrelevant to talk about it.
ask: Learning outcomes are related to classical conditioning?
What are the learning outcomes for you?
The term of successive approximations (shaping) belongs to the theory of behaviorism. I just want to know how these relate to modern theories.
may be that my concerns have no sense. What happens is that under the weight of determinism, with the cross of analysis (from the rock so it can be known), with the weight of Euclidean geometry and logically with the traditional method of teaching (which is embedded behaviorism and pinion principal), I think these modern theories the need to overcome.
And last for today What do you think of motivation online?
Jaqueline.
Jaqueline, better late than never.
From the point of view of the rubric of DocTIC proposal, the document seems consistent. The other issue is that rather than a treasure hunt solutions the problems of isolation, meaningful learning, students acquire skills in searching and analyzing information, working together and collaboratively.
I've never played a treasure hunt, but I guess if it's like Indiana Jones movies, that (go after the treasure) depends on the interest. Now, think what could be the treasure for rectilinear movement. The truth is that the linear motion is a mental construction of Newton does not exist in nature, is an abstraction as a number. So you should be very clear about what your students think of rectilinear movement (a good diagnosis, not the notes of the third period).
I think I would rather they seek a treasure, you must hunt the treasure, get into the game as another pair "must be the change you want to see in the world" Gandhi.
Finally when you talk about meaningful learning is "within the meaning of Ausubel?
0 comments:
Post a Comment