A RADICAL GROUP MEETS ON TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 22 - committing a sin? * By Mr. Mario Jaraz A meeting held by a group of radical leaders and members was held on Tuesday 22 September in the city of Buenos Aires led to a veritable flood of comments from diverse tones . Approval, disapproval, expectation, disappointment, represented different moods propitiatory positions with a high degree of hypersensitivity reached the end of the total disqualification of participants and the intentions that moved juntarse.La Radical Civic Union is a party that has freedom as one of its emblemas.Libertad to think, freedom to assemble, freedom to think, act and do, with the sole limit that represents the other's freedom, not freedom ajena.Dentro overwhelm this simple context is to analyze the uproar laughing caused by meeting, especially the analysis made of the intentions and connotations of the misma.Como reveals more than a declaration of ignorance about induced the true purposes were made by the error.El who often assume the cause of very deep problems, but also requires it to expose who not only personally but also in their positions. can cause much damage misrepresentation! In the center of the scene, with the label "criminal", they set the figure of the National Committee chairman Gerardo Morales trying to transform an apprentice "Furer. The egomaniac that all intended for himself, the man who considers himself as the only infallible, the mentor of all the wrong paths that transited the UCR that is contemporary. "Who was met Morales? With a large number of men inside the country with which, at the worst times he lived the game, took refuge in the doctrine and ideology of it to keep it from being swallowed by forces that the presence of radicalism are meant a drawback for their projects hegemónicos.También were men who in the course of time they were joining forces motivated by the spirit of survival and overcoming the actions that were developed transmitted. In the internal work in the party and externally in any scenario in which he played actuar.Estuvieron Rozas, Negri, Gil Lavedra, Campero, Ricardo Alfonsin, Zavalía, Bellia, Salvador. Anybody can, with honesty, questioning his radicalism? Was the Yuyo Gauna, Bonetto, Solmoirago Mission, Olmedo de La Rioja, Naidenoff of Formosa, Jujuy Giubergia, Nito Artaza, Cusinato of Entre Rios, Paterson, Benedetti. Are not radical forever? There were several young men and many others understand it unnecessary to name, because there was a meeting at which concurred with the aim of achieving spurious spaces but with the ambition to project a scenario, a meeting of radicals, which stripped of their endowments of leaders, legislators, or officials, be discussed with the freedom and independence of the Nation and the Radical Civic Union or Radical Civic Union and the Nation. As we say they were plotting together!. whom? Against what? We plotting a coup to take over the conduct of the UCR? Some or someone not even take notice that since the beginning of this century, when it begins the great debacle of politics and political parties against considering a large part of society, who quite legitimately assumed, with total courage and convictions, the responsibility of saving and reposition our party were many men who on Tuesday said the much-maligned this meeting. Do not they have the right to meet ? Is forbidden to exchange opinions, to think what is best for the party, the republic and people? Not the best way to lessen the possibility of making mistakes? "And if they will give formality, to institutionalize a space that was born spontaneously at the time of slaughter and was consolidated to light of the achievements that enabled the party to be present, even with weaknesses, has intact their identity, their beliefs and ideals? Did not you do? Who or whom they say? "Those who think differently and now face this new reality can say? We welcome those who do not think alike! A political party, like a human body, is alive and able to continue to grow, when all bodies meet funcionando.Nosotros good health and radicals, we can proudly say that our party is alive, everything works, that our doors, as in all times, were always open for those who think like us and for to thinking differently coming to our house to settle diferencias.Por admit radical differences and live with them pleasantly, if, internally, does not violate the party's founding principles that are still in force, and externally the differences were not instruments are leading to the disintegration and dissolution of the spirit of greatness social.Cuando discuss our differences in the fields as appropriate, without disqualifying anyone and we do so with the intention of building a party increasingly better prepared to provide the answers that society expects of its political parties, I welcome the debate.Cuando to democracy, which is not the best of all evils, but the great tool that invites and enables us to live with authenticity, learn to enjoy providing it with each of our events, meetings, as we did on Tuesday, not as acts of unspeakable assume rebels groups to go after dark and destructive goals, but as a meeting of a group of radicals who make full use of their rights and are mobilized by their ideas for better policies, but this can not compartirlas.Y is reality, and I can say, because I had and I have the luck to live from adentro.No said i have the absolute truth, we have ours, but we try to get as close as possible to the latest news mejor.Una: The meeting follows . It will be much larger. El Rosario 9 and October 10 próximos.Los we think the same, or similar, ... or we can go ir.Estamos sure that the party will make bien.Son many things that we think we should do we hope to project, we aim diseñar.Hacia inside and out. "appointed a domestic issue? With less than ninety days to choose the new leadership of the National Committee. Is it important or not? continue the way in which we have or give a turn? That issue ...!!!
